Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Model Open Government Partnership
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Malinaccier (talk) 01:02, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
- Model Open Government Partnership (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I failed to find coverage about this topic. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 07:48, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:32, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:32, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CThomas3 (talk) 05:18, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - does not meet the basic inclusion standard. I cannot find any reliable sources discussing it. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 00:43, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:26, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:26, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:34, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.